Bloorib 2065 - Div15 Station Wagon (Updated)

Type: Station Wagon, Chassis: Xtra-Heavy, Suspension: Heavy, Engine: Large (SC) (Pwr 2200, 10dp), Tires: 4 PR Tires (9dp), Crew: Driver (no equip), Weaponry ATG (10/reg) front (3D burst), 2 linked HR on rocket platform (3D, burst), Weighted Accessories: FE, Unweighted Accessories: SWC, [1 total link], Dischargers: 10 total: 4 oil (FBRL) 6 foam (2T, 2U, 1R 1L), Defenses: n/a; Wheel Armor: 40 total = 2x10 pt WG rear, 2x10 pt WH front, Component Armor:  10 pts FP around (a) driver, (b) PP, (c) ATG, Cargo: 7 spaces, 540 lbs; Vehicle Armor: 137 pts Composite Armor (2 LR Metal/135 FP Plastic): F(0/30) B(0/30) R(0/30) L(0/30) T(0/10) U(2/5); HC: 3, Acc. 5,  Top Speed 95, Cruising: 57, DM: 1, Hit Mod: 0, Weight: 6060 lbs. Max 6600, Cost: $15,000.00

• Defense Option -Type: Station Wagon, Chassis: Xtra-Heavy, Suspension: Heavy, Engine: Large (SC) (Pwr 2200, 10dp), Tires: 4 PR Tires (9dp), Crew: Driver (no equip), Weaponry ATG (10/reg) front (3D burst), 2 linked HR on rocket platform (3D, burst), SS (10/reg) rear, SD (10/reg) rear, OJ (25/reg) rear, all 3 linked, Weighted Accessories: n/a, Unweighted Accessories: SWC, [2 total linked], Dischargers: 10 total: 4 oil (FBRL) 4 smoke (2U, 1R 1L), 2 foam (2T), Defenses: n/a; Wheel Armor: 40 total = 2x10 pt WG rear, 2x10 pt WH front, Component Armor:  n/a, Cargo: 7 spaces, 665 lbs; Vehicle Armor: 137 pts Composite Armor (2 LR Metal/135 FP Plastic): F(0/30) B(0/30) R(0/30) L(0/30) T(0/10) U(2/5); HC: 3, Acc. 5,  Top Speed 95, Cruising: 57, DM: 1, Hit Mod: 0, Weight: 5935 lbs. Max 6600, Cost: $15,000.00.

Design Notes - Update, for the sake of updating, of this embarrassing 2037 design.

Station Wagon, Standard Chassis, Light Suspension, Large PP, 4 PR Tires, Driver, ATG front, 2 HRs left, 2 HRs right, 135 pts Plastic Armor: F 30 B 30 R 25 L 25 T 10 U 15; HC: 1 Acc. 5, 5500 lbs. (max 5500), $9,600.00

The first version is to make this fulfill the weapon system while still being half-way usable. I mean, who has a light chassis on a cargo hauler?  Even for an 'economy' car.  Then again, why have the overweight, inaccurate ATG on a cargo hauler?!

Name Notes -  It's terrible, see the original.